AN EXPLORATIVE REVIEW ON FISHES BIOMECHANICS AND BIOELECTRICITY
Main Article Content
Keywords
Icthyo-Mechanics; Icthyo-electricity; Mathematical Modeling; Electro-Receptors; Electro-Therapy
Abstract
Fish biomechanics and bioelectricity are complex and fascinating areas of study that have attracted the attention of researchers from a variety of disciplines. Fish have unique adaptations that allow them to swim and maneuver efficiently in their aquatic environments, and to generate and use electric fields for a variety of purposes. This review explores recent developments in the study of fish biomechanics and bioelectricity, and provides an overview of the current state of knowledge in these fields. In the field of fish biomechanics, researchers have used mathematical models to gain insights into the mechanisms underlying fish movement and propulsion. These models have helped to explain the sophisticated mechanisms that enable fish to generate powerful, precise movements that allow them to swim and maneuver with remarkable efficiency. Additionally, the study of fish biomechanics has inspired the development of new underwater propulsion systems for military and industrial applications. In the field of fish bioelectricity, researchers have focused on understanding the mechanisms underlying the production of electric fields by fish, and their use in a variety of physiological and behavioral processes. For example, electric fields play a critical role in predator avoidance, prey detection, and communication in fish. The study of fish electrogenesis has also led to the development of new electrotherapy techniques for the treatment of a variety of medical conditions. Overall, this review provides an overview of the current state of knowledge in the fields of fish biomechanics and bioelectricity, and highlights the importance of these areas of study for our understanding of these remarkable animals, and for the development of new technologies and applications.
Downloads
References
Stevens, J. D., Bonfil, R., Dulvy, N. K., & Walker, P. A. (2000). The effects of fishing on sharks, rays, and chimaeras (chondrichthyans), and the implications for marine ecosystems. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 57(3), 476-494. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmsc.2000.0724 Lutek, K., Donatelli, C. M., & Standen, E. M. (2022). Patterns and processes in amphibious fish: biomechanics and neural control of fish terrestrial locomotion. Journal of Experimental Biology, 225(8), jeb242395. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.242395 Webb, P. W. (1984). Form and function in fish swimming. Scientific American, 251(1), 72-83. Yu, J., Wu, Z., Su, Z., Wang, T., & Qi, S. (2019). Motion control strategies for a repetitive leaping robotic dolphin. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 24(3), 913-923. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMECH.2019.2908082 Martin, R. A. (2007). A review of shark agonistic displays: comparison of display features and implications for shark–human interactions. Marine and Freshwater Behaviour and Physiology, 40(1), 3-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/10236240601154872 Weihs, D. (1989). Design features and mechanics of axial locomotion in fish. American Zoologist, 29(1), 151-160. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/29.1.151 Wolf, Z., Jusufi, A., Vogt, D. M., & Lauder, G. V. (2020). Fish-like aquatic propulsion studied using a pneumatically-actuated soft-robotic model. Bioinspiration & biomimetics, 15(4), 046008. Voesenek, C. J., Muijres, F. T., & Van Leeuwen, J. L. (2018). Biomechanics of swimming in developing larval fish. Journal of Experimental Biology, 221(1), jeb149583. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.149583 Jin, S. W., Lee, G. H., Kim, J. Y., Kim, C. Y., Choo, Y. M., Cho, W., ... & Jeong, H. G. (2022). Effect of porcine whole blood protein hydrolysate on slow-twitch muscle fiber expression and mitochondrial biogenesis via the AMPK/SIRT1 pathway. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 23(3), 1229. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23031229 Blake, R. W. (2004). Fish functional design and swimming performance. Journal of fish biology, 65(5), 1193-1222. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-1112.2004.00568.x Wardle, C. S. (1986). Fish behaviour and fishing gear. The behaviour of teleost fishes, 463-495. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-8261-4_18 Compagno, L. J. (1990). Alternative life-history styles of cartilaginous fishes in time and space. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 28, 33-75. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00751027 Crampin, E. J., Halstead, M., Hunter, P., Nielsen, P., Noble, D., Smith, N., & Tawhai, M. (2004). Computational physiology and the physiome project. Experimental Physiology, 89(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1113/expphysiol.2003.026740 Lauder, G. V., & Di Santo, V. (2015). Swimming mechanics and energetics of elasmobranch fishes. In Fish physiology (Vol. 34, pp. 219-253). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-801289-5.00006-7 Maruska, K. P., & Sisneros, J. A. (2016). Comparison of electrophysiological auditory measures in fishes. Fish Hearing and Bioacoustics: An anthology in honor of Arthur N. Popper and Richard R. Fay, 227-254. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21059-9_11 Haehnel-Taguchi, M., Akanyeti, O., & Liao, J. C. (2018). Behavior, electrophysiology, and robotics experiments to study lateral line sensing in fishes. Integrative and comparative biology, 58(5), 874-883. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icy066 Tomita, T. (1965, January). Electrophysiological study of the mechanisms subserving color coding in the fish retina. In Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology (Vol. 30, pp. 559-566). Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. https://doi.org/10.1101/SQB.1965.030.01.054 Atema, J. (1980). Chemical senses, chemical signals and feeding behavior in fishes. Fish Behaviour and its Use in the Capture and Culture of Fishes, 57-101. Rother, D., Migliaro, A., Canetti, R., Gómez, L., Caputi, A., & Budelli, R. (2003). Electric images of two low resistance objects in weakly electric fish. Biosystems, 71(1-2), 169-177. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0303-2647(03)00124-2 Kempster, R. M., McCarthy, I. D., & Collin, S. P. (2012). Phylogenetic and ecological factors influencing the number and distribution of electroreceptors in elasmobranchs. Journal of Fish Biology, 80(5), 2055-2088. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2011.03214.x Crampton, W. G. (2019). Electroreception, electrogenesis and electric signal evolution. Journal of Fish Biology, 95(1), 92-134. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.13922 Hartman, K. J., Margraf, F. J., Hafs, A. W., & Cox, M. K. (2015). Bioelectrical impedance analysis: a new tool for assessing fish condition. Fisheries, 40(12), 590-600. https://doi.org/10.1080/03632415.2015.1106943 Pothoven, S. A., Ludsin, S. A., Höök, T. O., Fanslow, D. L., Mason, D. M., Collingsworth, P. D., & Van Tassell, J. J. (2008). Reliability of bioelectrical impedance analysis for estimating whole-fish energy density and percent lipids. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 137(5), 1519-1529. https://doi.org/10.1577/T07-185.1 Caldarone, E. M., MacLean, S. A., & Sharack, B. (2012). Evaluation of bioelectrical impedance analysis and Fulton's condition factor as nonlethal techniques for estimating short-term responses in postsmolt Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) to food availability. Fishery Bulletin, 110(2). Stoddard, P. K., Tran, A., & Krahe, R. (2019). Predation and crypsis in the evolution of electric signaling in weakly electric fishes. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 7, 264. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2019.00264 Markham, M. R., McAnelly, M. L., Stoddard, P. K., & Zakon, H. H. (2009). Circadian and social cues regulate ion channel trafficking. PLoS biology, 7(9), e1000203. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000203 Zago, S., Priori, A., Ferrucci, R., & Lorusso, L. (2021). Historical aspects of transcranial electric stimulation. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Neuropsychiatric Disorders: Clinical Principles and Management, 3-19. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76136-3_1 Hayes, A. J., & Melrose, J. (2020). Electro‐Stimulation, a Promising Therapeutic Treatment Modality for Tissue Repair: Emerging Roles of Sulfated Glycosaminoglycans as Electro‐Regulatory Mediators of Intrinsic Repair Processes. Advanced Therapeutics, 3(11), 2000151. https://doi.org/10.1002/adtp.202000151 Joshi, A., Krishnan, S., & Kaushik, V. (2022a). Codon usage studies and epitope-based peptide vaccine prediction against Tropheryma whipplei. Journal of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, 20(1), 41. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43141-022-00324-5 Joshi, A., Solanki, D. S., Gehlot, P., Singh, J., & Kaushik, V. (2022b). In-Silico Validation of Prosopis ciniraria Therapeutic Peptides Against Fungal Cell Wall: Better Treatment Strategy for Fungal Diseases. International Journal of Peptide Research and Therapeutics, 28, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10989-021-10330-9
Article Sidebar
Article Details
How to Cite
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Transfer of Copyright and Permission to Reproduce Parts of Published Papers.
Authors retain the copyright for their published work. No formal permission will be required to reproduce parts (tables or illustrations) of published papers, provided the source is quoted appropriately and reproduction has no commercial intent. Reproductions with commercial intent will require written permission and payment of royalties.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.