AUTHENTIC ASSESSMENT TOWARDS TRANSFORMATION OF LEARNERS PERFORMANCE
Main Article Content
Keywords
Administration and Supervision, authentic assessment, Teaching Mathematics
Abstract
This research ascertained the extent of the implementation of the authentic assessment by teachers in teaching Mathematics to Grade VI pupils in Lagtang Elementary School, Biasong Elementary School, and Talisay City Central Elementary School during the School Year 2022 – 2023 as basis for the enhanced Math authentic assessment activities activities. The researcher made use of the descriptive-correlational method of research. The questions were derived from the study of Sutadji, Susilo, Wibawa, Jabari, & Rohmad (2021). The results showed that two-thirds of the teachers were female and the remaining three were male. They were all of the appropriate age to be teachers, about 80% of them were married, and twenty of them were sent to regional level workshops, seminars, and trainings on teaching mathematics that were relevant to their field. The students, on the other hand, were of the age group anticipated to enroll in the grade level and were split equally between the sexes. In terms of the assessment form, approach, and component, the teachers said that they Strongly Agree with using such assessments to improve their students' performance in mathematics, with cumulative means of 3.92, 3.79, and 3.83, respectively. In terms of the learners' performance, it was discovered that the bulk of them scored in the range of 7 to 9, followed by the score range of 4 to 6. 41.95% of students, on average, are having difficulty with the aforementioned competences. Due to the significant number of pupils affected, it was felt that this issue needed to be addressed. relationship between teachers’ perceived authentic assessment utilization and the level of performance of the learners in the three competencies. Thus, it is recommended that the enhancement activities for mathematics to improve learners’ performance
Downloads
References
1. Abdullah, A.G., Aryanti, T., Setiawan, A., & Alias, M.B. (2017). Regionalization and Harmonization in TVET; Taylor & Francis: London, UK. 1. 2. Abril, J. G., Acerbo, C. T., & Abocejo, F. T. (2022). The Philippine informal reading inventory (Phil-IRI) program: A critical analysis. Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education (BirLE) Journal, 5(4), 432-441. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birle.v5i4.7270 2. Abun, D. (2021). The effect of educational attainment, length of work experience on the self-efficacy of teachers and employees. Available at SSRN 3954135. 3. Adrima, E. (2019). The use of authentic assessment in mathematics learning. Journal of Mathematics Education, 12(2), 45-54. 4. Alangui, W. (2022). Authentic assessment in Mathematics VI: A tool for student-centered learning. International Journal of Education and Practice, 10(2), 120-129. 5. Alhassan, H. M., & Abdu-Raheem, H. (2019). Utilization of authentic assessment and its impact on the performance of students in mathematics. Journal of Education and Practice, 10(19), 70-75. 6. Ali, R. K., & Hamza, M. A. (2018). Impact of teachers’ training on students’ learning attitude and organizational performance. The International Journal of Business and Management, 6(10), 239-248. 7. Alufohai, P. J., & Ibhafidon, H. E. (2015). Influence of teachers’ age, marital status and gender on students’ academic achievement. Asian Journal of Educational Research, 3(4). 8. Arlianty, W. N., Febriana, B. W., Diniaty, A., & Fauzi’ah, L. (2017, December). Designing assignment using authentic assessment. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 1911, No. 1). AIP Publishing. 9. Bates, B. (2019). Learning theories simplified: And how to apply them to teaching. Learning Theories Simplified, 1-384. 10. Bernardo, A. B. (2021). Socioeconomic status moderates the relationship between growth mindset and learning in mathematics and science: Evidence from PISA 2018 Philippine data. International Journal of School & Educational Psychology, 9(2), 208-222. 11. CAGASAN JR, L. O. U. I. E., GRIFFIN, P., NAVA, F. J., VISTA, A., & CARE, E. (2015). FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT PROJECT. 12. Chong, E. J. M., Lim, J. S. W., Liu, Y., Lau, Y. Y. L., & Wu, V. X. (2016). Improvement of learning domains of nursing students with the use of authentic assessment pedagogy in clinical practice. Nurse education in practice, 20, 125-130.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2016.08.002 13. Cook, J. (2021). What is Authentic Assessment in Education? Retrieved from https://study.com/academy/lesson/authentic-assessment-examples-for-english-language-learners.html 14. Department of Education. (2019). DM 173, 3B: Bawat bata bumabasa. Retrieved from https://www.deped.gov.ph/2019/11/22/november-22-2019-dm-173-s-2019-hamonbawat-bata-bumabasa-3bs-initiative/ 15. Department of Education. 2019. PISA 2018 Philippine National Report; Pasig City: Department of Education. Available online: https: //www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/PISA-2018-Philippine-National-Report.pdf (accessed on 3 January 2022). 16. DepEd. (2020). Most Essential Learning Competencies in Mathematics. Retrieved from https://dcpnhs.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Mathematics-MELCs.pdf 17. Drew, C. (2021). Sociocultural Theory of Learning in the Classroom. Retrieved March 5, 2022. https://helpfulprofessor.com/sociocultural-theory-education/ 18. Francisco, A. R. S. (2020). Teachers' Personal and Professional Demographic Characteristics as Predictors of Students' Academic Performance in English. Online Submission, 5(2), 80-91.DOI: http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3997430 19. Garingan, J. G. (2019). Authentic assessment in mathematics: issues and challenges in the Philippine context. Journal of Mathematics Education, 12(1), 1-12. 20. Graham, L. J., White, S. L., Cologon, K., & Pianta, R. C. (2020). Do teachers’ years of experience make a difference in the quality of teaching?. Teaching and teacher education, 96, 103190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103190 21. Golden, P. (2018). Contextualized writing: Promoting audience-centered writing through scenario based learning. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 12(1), 6. 22. Grant, K., Fedoruk, L., & Nowell, L. (2021). Conversations and reflections on authentic assessment. Imagining SoTL, 1, 146-162. 23. Horn, A. S., & Jang, S. T. (2017). The Impact of Graduate Education on Teacher Effectiveness: Does a Master's Degree Matter? MHEC Research Brief. Midwestern Higher Education Compact. 24. Baccalaureate, I. O. (2020). Online learning, teaching and education continuity planning for schools. International Baccalaureate, 1-13. 25. Jung, I. H., Lee, M., & Kim, J. (2017). A study on the evaluation of authentic mathematics assessment. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(9), 5857-5870. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.01037a 26. Karunanayaka, S. P., & Naidu, S. (2021). Impacts of authentic assessment on the development of graduate attributes. Distance Education, 42(2), 231-252. 27. Korantwi-Barimah, J. S., Ofori, A., Nsiah-Gyabaah, E., & Sekyere, A. M. (2017). Relationship between motivation, academic self-concept and academic achievement amongst students at a Ghanaian Technical University. International Journal of Human Resource Studies, 7(1), 61-73. 28. Kurniawati, Y. (2018). The importance of authentic assessment in mathematics education. Journal of Educational Research and Evaluation, 2(1), 27-34. 29. Lasaten, R. C. S. (2016). Assessment Methods, Problems and Training Needs of Public High School Teachers in English. International Journal of Languages, Literature and Linguistics, 2(2), 55-60. 30. Lazarides, R., Dicke, A. L., Rubach, C., & Eccles, J. S. (2020). Profiles of motivational beliefs in math: Exploring their development, relations to student-perceived classroom characteristics, and impact on future career aspirations and choices. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(1), 70. 31. Liu, Y., & Hou, S. (2018). Potential reciprocal relationship between motivation and achievement: A longitudinal study. School Psychology International, 39(1), 38-55. 32. Loveless, B. (2022). A Completion Guide to Schema Theory and Its Role in Education. Retrieved from https://www.educationcorner.com/schema-theory/ 33. Maheshwari, V.K. (2015). Gestalt Theory – The Insight Learning. Retrieved from http://www.vkmaheshwari.com/WP/?p=1841 34. Magno, C. (2018). Authentic assessment in mathematics: Issues and challenges for Philippine schools. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 8(4), 93-97. 35. Maniram, R., & Maistry, S. M. (2018). Enabling well-being and epistemological access through an authentic assessment intervention: A case study of a higher education programme. South African Journal of Higher Education, 32(6), 305-325. 36. Mariano, C. R. (2020). Authentic assessment in Grade 6 Mathematics: A review of the literature. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, Arts and Sciences, 7(4), 30-37. 37. Mason, J., & O'Reilly, J. (2019). Authentic assessment in mathematics: challenges and opportunities. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 31(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-018-0251-8 38. Mavis, B. (n.d.). Why Every Teacher Needs to Study Special Education. Point Loma Nazarene University. https://www.pointloma.edu/resources/education/why-every-teacher-needs-study-special-education-0 39. Messier, N. (2022). Authentic Assessments. University of Illinois Chicago. Retrieved from https://teaching.uic.edu/resources/teaching-guides/assessment-grading-practices/authentic-assessments/ 40. Moschkovich, J. N. (1998). Rethinking Authentic Assessments of Student Mathematical Activity. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 20(4), 1-18. 41. Ismail, R. A. M., Arshad, R., & Abas, Z. (2018). Can teachers’ age and experience influence teacher effectiveness in HOTS. International Journal of Advanced Studies in Social Science and Innovation, 2(1). 42. Mueller, J. (2006). What is authentic assessment. dalam http://jfmueller. faculty. noctrl. edu. Diakses pada, 13. 43. Nutt, D. (2020). Inquiry-based labs give physics students experimental edge. Retrieved from https://news.cornell.edu/stories/2020/02/inquiry-based-labs-give-physics-students-experimental-edge 44. Omela, E. T., & Martin, M. D. M. (2020). Teachers’ motivational strategies employed in teaching passive pupils. EDUCATUM Journal of Social Sciences, 6(1), 1-11.https://ejournal.upsi.edu.my/index.php/EJOSS/article/view/2805 45. Osadebe, P. U., & Ebikoro, T. O. (2018). Assessment of Human Resource Variables as Correlates of Students’ Performance in Mathematics in Secondary Schools. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 5(5). 46. Othman, W. H., & Satar, H. M. (2019). The impact of authentic assessment on students' performance in science. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 5(4), 252-265. 47. Pade, H., Ingram, P., & Wright, A. J. (2020). Teaching and Supervising Assessment beyond COVID-19. American Psychological Association. 48. Polly, D., Allman, B., Casto, A., & Norwood, J. (2017). Sociocultural perspectives of learning. Foundations of learning and instructional design technology. 49. Putra, R. N., Sukirman, E., & Abdullah, A. H. (2020). Utilization of authentic assessment in science learning to improve critical thinking skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1468(1), 012050. 50. Shah, S. R., & Udgaonkar, U. S. (2018). Influence of gender and age of teachers on teaching: Students perspective. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 7(1), 2436-2441. 51. Sormin, S., & Siahaan, P. (2021). Factors affecting the utilization of authentic assessment in science learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1836(1), 012066. 52. Susani, R. (2018). The implementation of authentic assessment in extensive reading. International Journal of Education, 11(1), 87-92. 53. Sutadji, E., Susilo, H., Wibawa, A. P., Jabari, N. A., & Rohmad, S. N. (2021). Authentic assessment implementation in natural and social science. Education Sciences, 11(9), 534. 54. Wilson-Mah, R. (2019). A Study of Authentic Assessment in an Internship Course. Papers on Postsecondary Learning and Teaching, 3, 65-73. 55. Venegas, M., Gonzalez, J., & Flórez, L. M. (2022). Authentic assessment in mathematics: a review of the literature. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 53(1), 35-53. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2021.1970359 56. Villar, M. J. L., Crisostomo, R. N., Wahing, J. M., Carzano, L. M. M., Progella, C. M., & Derasin, L. M. C. (2023). Classroom Management Skills Of Junior High School Teachers During The Resumption Of Face-To-Face Classes. European Chemical Bulletin, Volume 12, Special issue 1. 3241-3249 57. Villarroel, V., Bloxham, S., Bruna, D., Bruna, C., & Herrera-Seda, C. (2018). Authentic assessment: creating a blueprint for course design. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(5), 840-854.
Article Sidebar
Published
June 30, 2023
Article Details
How to Cite
1.
Ma. Angelica M. Lauronilla 1; Corazon A. Abellana 2; Licel L. Talibong 3; and Ian V. Albarando 4
AUTHENTIC ASSESSMENT TOWARDS TRANSFORMATION OF LEARNERS PERFORMANCE
. 2023 . 13;94(1): 2285-2314 . Available from: https://mattioli.1885journals.com/article/2023/2285.html
Issue
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Transfer of Copyright and Permission to Reproduce Parts of Published Papers.
Authors retain the copyright for their published work. No formal permission will be required to reproduce parts (tables or illustrations) of published papers, provided the source is quoted appropriately and reproduction has no commercial intent. Reproductions with commercial intent will require written permission and payment of royalties.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.