EFFECT OF ORTHODONTIC BONE SCREWS ON ALVEOLAR BONE
Main Article Content
Keywords
Abstract
This review aims to summarise the various effects of orthodontic bone screws on alveolar bone. Orthodontic bone screws are superior to traditional orthodontic anchoring because they make the best use of traction forces, they have recast the approach to complex malocclusions in a significant way. These have been developed bearing the idea that they are placed in extra-alveolar locations, far from the roots, and in regions with a lot of cortical bone, in order to effect tooth movement. Although they have an advantage in terms of root safety and successful tooth movements, it is crucial that the clinician concentrate on the right case selection for the same. They played a major part in the area of orthodontics, and did so with great success. They also cost less money to treat patients, take less time to finish treatment since dental anchoring does not need to be created, and require less maintenance. Bone screw microdamage, however, can have a number of detrimental repercussions, including delayed bone healing, an increased risk of implant failure, and potential long-term issues. The degree and extent of microdamage Relies on various variables, including screw type, insertion method, bone quality, and patient-specific characteristics. In order to find relevant data about the varied impacts and microdamage induced by orthodontic bone screws in clinical practise, many internet databases were searched for. On the topic of microdamage on alveolar bone, references and citations of previously published reviews and studies were also looked for. The primary purpose of this review is to enhance understanding regarding the diverse impacts of bone screws utilized in orthodontic procedures on the alveolar bone.
Downloads
References
[1] Teekavanich C Evaluation of Cortical Bone Microdamage and Primary Stability of Orthodontic Miniscrew Using a Human Bone Analogue. Materials. 2021; 14(8):1825. n.d. [2] Kanomi R. Mini-implant for orthodontic anchorage. J Clin Orthod. 1997;31(11):763767. n.d. [3] Nguyen MV; CJ; FL; DCW; SWJ. The influence of miniscrew insertion torque. Eur. J. Orthod. 2018, 40, 37–44. n.d. [4] Yadav S; UM; LS; RE; NWP; NR. Microdamage of the cortical bone during mini-implant insertion with self-drilling and self-tapping techniques: A randomized controlled trial. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 2012, 141, 538–546 n.d. [5] Liu SS; C-ME; SJ; SKT; AMR. Orthodontic mini-implant diameter does not affect in-situ linear microcrack generation in the mandible or the maxilla. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 2012, 142, 768–773. n.d. [6] Shank SB; BFM; DAM; HSS. Bone damage associated with orthodontic placement of miniscrew implants in an animal model. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 2012, 141, 412–418. n.d. [7] Sowden D; SJP. AO self-drilling and self-tapping screws in rat calvarial bone: An ultrastructural study of the implant interface. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2002, 60, 294–299, discussion 300. n.d. [8] Taing-Watson E; KTRSKT; GA; CGT; KHM; LSS. Microdamage generation by tapered and cylindrical mini-screw implants after pilot drilling. Angle Orthod. 2015, 85, 859–867 n.d. [9] Çehreli S AÖA. Primary stability and histomorphometric bone-implant contact of self- drilling and selftapping orthodontic microimplants. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2012;141:187-95. n.d. [10] Florvaag B; KP; LF; KJ; ZJE; BB; MRA. Biomechanical properties of orthodontic miniscrews. An in-vitro study. J. Orofac. Orthop. 2010, 71, 53–67. n.d. [11] Melsen B. Mini-implants: Where are we? J Clin Orthod 2005;39:53947; quiz 531-2. n.d. [12] Wawrzinek C. Microdamage in cortical bone due to the overtightening of orthodontic microscrews. J Orofac Orthop 2008;69:121-34. n.d. [13] Ellis JA Jr LDM. Analysis of seating and fracturing torque of bicortical screws. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1994 May;52(5):483-6; discussion 487-8. n.d. [14] Wilmes B; RC; OG; DD. Parameters affecting primary stability of orthodontic mini-implants. J. Orofac. Orthop. 2006, 67, 162–174. n.d. [15] Uemura M; MM; YS; SM; IY; SN. Orthodontic mini-implant stability and the ratio of pilot hole implant diameter. Eur. J. Orthod. 2012, 34, 52–56. n.d. [16] Verna C et al. Microdamage in porcine alveolar bone due to functional and orthodontic loading. Eur J Morphol 2005;42:3–11. Microdamage in porcine alveolar bone due to functional and orthodontic loading. Eur J Morphol 2005;42:3–11. n.d. [17] Huja SS et al. Microdamage adjacent to endosseous implants. Bone 1999;25:217–22. n.d. [18] Feldmann A; SM; SS; NL. Experimental evaluation of cortical bone substitute materials for tool development, surgical training and drill bit wear investigations. Med. Eng. Phys. 2019, 66, 107–112. n.d. [19] Wang L; YT; DL; SJ; QJ; ZQ; WL; QS. Repair of microdamage in osteonal cortical bone adjacent to bone screw. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e89343. n.d.
Article Sidebar
Article Details
How to Cite
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Transfer of Copyright and Permission to Reproduce Parts of Published Papers.
Authors retain the copyright for their published work. No formal permission will be required to reproduce parts (tables or illustrations) of published papers, provided the source is quoted appropriately and reproduction has no commercial intent. Reproductions with commercial intent will require written permission and payment of royalties.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.