A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF INTRAVENOUS LABETALOL AND ORAL NIFEDIPINE FOR CONTROL OF BLOOD PRESSURE IN SEVERE PRE-ECLAMPSIA IN A TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL
Main Article Content
Keywords
Abstract
Background: Hypertension is the most common medical disorder in pregnancy, complicating 6- 10% pregnancies1. Treatment of severely increased blood pressure is widely recommended to reduce the risk of maternal and fetal complications. Regimens for acute treatment of severe hypertension in pre-eclampsia include intravenous medications. Although effective, these drugs require venous access and careful fetal monitoring and might not be feasible in busy or low resource environments. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the efficacy of intravenous labetalol and oral nifedipine for control of hypertension in severe pre-eclampsia. Objective: To compare efficacy of intravenous labetelol and oral nifedipine when used rapidly to lower high blood pressure in severe pre-eclampsia mothers. Methodology: This is a hospital based prospective randomized interventional comparative trial conducted at Midnapore Medical College and Hospital from April ’21 to Sep ’22. The study has a sample size of 100 patients divided into two groups randomly, group A received intravenous labetelol injection (in escalating dose of 20,40, 80 and 80 mg every 30 mins, maximum dose of 220mg) and group B received oral nifedipine (10mg tablet orally upto 5 doses) every 30 mins2. Target BP is ≤ 150/ 90 mm of Hg. After target BP is reached further antihypertensive given as per choice. Results: In labetalol group 18 (32%) patients achieved target blood pressure with 1 dose, 10 patients (20%) with 2 doses, 14 (28%) with 3 doses and 8 (16%) with 4 doses while in nifedipine group 16 (32%) of patients achieved target blood pressure with 1 dose, 12 patients (24%) with 2 doses, 10 (20%) with 3 doses, 8 (16%) with 4 doses and 4 (8%) with 5 doses and P value is non significant (0.29).The mean average reduction in systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood Pressure after 30 minutes of drug administration was 6.04± 7.38mmHg and 6.88±4.8mmHg for labetalol and for nifedipine it was 4.32±4.22mmHg and 5.12±3.9mmHg with a non significant P value of 0.469. The mean time required to achieve target BP in Group A was 67.2±33.168 minutes and In Group B was 73.2±38.475 minutes with a P value of 0.405 which stands non significant. Conclusion: Oral nifedipine and intravenous labetalol regimens are almost equally effective in acute control of blood pressure in severe preeclampsia.
Downloads
References
1. Cunningham et al. Hypertensive Disorders. In:Williams Obstetrics 25th edition .United States of America,New York,2018: 739-740 2. Cunningham FG, Veno KJ, Bloom SL, et al. Pregnancy Hypertension. In: Williams Obstetrics. 23e. 2010.:693 – 744 3. The Magpie Trial Collaboration Group. Do women with pre-eclampsia, and their babies, benefit from magnesium sulphate? The Magpie Trial: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2002;359:1877-90. 4. Magee LA, Helewa M, Moutquin JM, von Dadelszen P. Hypertension Guidelines Committee, Strategic Training Initiative in Research in the Reproductive Health Sciences (STIRRHS) Scholars. Diagnosis, evaluation and management of the hypertension disorders of pregnancy.J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2008;30(Suppl 3): S1-48 5. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). Hypertension in Pregnancy: The management of hypertensive disorders during pregnancy .2010; NICE clinical guideline 107:1-295 6. Society of Obstetrics Medicine of Australia and New Zealand (SOMANZ). Guidelines for the management of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy 2008. 7. Roberts CL, Ford JB, Algert CS, Antonsen S, Chalmers J, Cnattingius S, et al Populationbased trends in pregnancy hypertension and pre-eclampsia: an international comparative study. BMJ Open 2011; 1: e000101 8. Tuffnell D, Shennan AH, Waugh JJS, Walker JJ. The management of severe preeclampsia/ eclampsia. RCOG guideline number 10(A) In: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, 2006 9. Too GT, Hill JB. Hypertensive crisis during pregnancy and postpartum period. Semin Perinatol 2013; 37: 280–287 10. Saudan P, Brown MA, Buddle ML, Jones M. Does gestational hypertension become preeclampsia? Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1998, 105: 1177-1184 11. Lewis G. The Confidential Enquiry into Maternal and Child Health (CEMACH). Saving mothers' lives: reviewing maternal deaths to make motherhood safer – 2003–2005. The Seventh Report on Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in the United Kingdom. London: CEMACH; 2007. 12. Brown CM, Garovic VD. Drug treatment of hypertension in pregnancy. Drugs 2014; 74: 283–296 13. Maggie LA.Antihypertensives.Best practice and research.Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology 2001;15:827-45 14. Raheem IA, Saaid R, Omar S Z. Oral nifidepine versus intravenous labetalol for acute blood pressure control in hypertensive emergencies of pregnancy: a randomised trial: BJOG 2011; DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03151. 15. National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence. Hypertension in Pregnancy, The management of hypertensive disorders during pregnancy. Clinical guidelines CG107 Issued: August 2010. Accessible on http://guidance.nice.org.uk/CG107. 16. Joint National Committee or detection, evaluation and treatment of high blood pressure. The sixth report of the joint national committee on prevention, detection, evaluation and treatment of high blood pressure (JNC VI).Archives of internal medicine 1997;157:2413- 2446. 17. Magee L A, Ornstein M P, Von Dadelszen P. Management of hypertension in pregnancy. BMJ; 1999:318 1332 – 1336. 18. Sibai BM: Diagnosis and management of gestational hypertension and preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol 2003, 102:181–192.
