FETAL ULTRASOUND IN DIAGNOSING CONGENITAL RENAL ANOMALIES: A CASE SERIES
Main Article Content
Keywords
Urinary tract dilation, Congenital renal anomalies, Fetal ultrasound, Ectopic kidney, Renal agenesis, Posterior urethral valve
Abstract
This case series evaluates the accuracy of fetal ultrasound in diagnosing congenital renal anomalies through the examination of seven cases, comparing prenatal findings with postnatal outcomes. Case 1, at 23 weeks gestation, showed mild urinary tract dilation (UTD A1) with a renal pelvic diameter (RPD) of 5.0 mm, which resolved spontaneously by the follow-up growth scan. Case 2 presented at 31 weeks with an RPD of 9.8 mm (UTD A1), and postnatal scans confirmed persistent dilation (UTD P1), necessitating ongoing monitoring. In Case 3, a 28-week scan revealed a significant left kidney PUJ obstruction with an RPD of 26 mm (UTD A2-3), confirmed postnatally as severe urinary tract dilation (UTD P3) requiring intervention. Case 4, detected at 18 weeks, involved an ectopic right kidney adjacent to the bladder, with the absence of the right renal artery confirmed postnatally. Case 5, identified at 18 weeks, showed bilateral enlarged echogenic kidneys, leading to pregnancy termination at 21 weeks due to a poor prognosis, consistent with similar findings in a previous pregnancy. Case 6, at 20 weeks, showed anhydramnios and bilateral renal agenesis, confirmed by the absence of renal arteries and kidneys on imaging, resulting in pregnancy termination at 21 weeks. Case 7, at 12 weeks, revealed a dilated bladder, distended posterior urethra, and bilaterally enlarged echogenic kidneys, indicating a posterior urethral valve, leading to termination at 14 weeks due to the severity. These cases highlight the crucial role of fetal ultrasound in early detection and management of congenital renal anomalies, demonstrating its capabilities and the necessity for confirmatory postnatal diagnostics.
Downloads
References
1. Hindryckx A, De Catte L. Prenatal diagnosis of congenital renal and urinary tract malformations. Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2011;3(3):165-74. 2. Walker EYX, Winyard P, Marlais M. Congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract: antenatal diagnosis, management and counselling of families. Pediatr Nephrol. 2024;39(4):1065-75. 3. Stonebrook E, Hoff M, Spencer JD. Congenital Anomalies of the Kidney and Urinary Tract: A Clinical Review. Curr Treat Options Pediatr. 2019;5(3):223-35. 4. Conner SN, Longman RE, Cahill AG. The role of ultrasound in the diagnosis of fetal genetic syndromes. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2014;28(3):417-28. 5. Yousefpour Shahrivar R, Karami F, Karami E. Enhancing Fetal Anomaly Detection in Ultrasonography Images: A Review of Machine Learning-Based Approaches. Biomimetics (Basel). 2023;8(7). 6. Barakat AJ, Butler MG, Cobb CG, Coursey JW, Shah D. Reliability of ultrasound in the prenatal diagnosis of urinary tract abnormalities. Pediatr Nephrol. 1991;5(1):12-4. 7. Gulyuz A, Tekin M. The Diagnostic Efficacy of and Requirement for Postnatal Ultrasonography Screening for Congenital Anomalies of the Kidney and Urinary Tract. Diagnostics. 2023;13:3106. 8. Nguyen HT, Phelps A, Coley B, Darge K, Rhee A, Chow JS. 2021 update on the urinary tract dilation (UTD) classification system: clarifications, review of the literature, and practical suggestions. Pediatr Radiol. 2022;52(4):740-51. 9. Chow JS, Koning JL, Back SJ, Nguyen HT, Phelps A, Darge K. Classification of pediatric urinary tract dilation: the new language. Pediatr Radiol. 2017;47(9):1109-15. 10. Cakici EK, Aydog O, Eroglu FK, Yazilitas F, Ozlu SG, Uner C, et al. Value of renal pelvic diameter and urinary tract dilation classification in the prediction of urinary tract anomaly. Pediatr Int. 2019;61(3):271-7. 11. Nguyen HT, Benson CB, Bromley B, Campbell JB, Chow J, Coleman B, et al. Multidisciplinary consensus on the classification of prenatal and postnatal urinary tract dilation (UTD classification system). J Pediatr Urol. 2014;10(6):982-98. 12. Hwang J, Kim PH, Yoon HM, Song SH, Jung AY, Lee JS, et al. Application of the postnatal urinary tract dilation classification system to predict the need for surgical intervention among neonates and young infants. Ultrasonography. 2023;42(1):136-46. 13. Sinha A, Bagga A, Krishna A, Bajpai M, Srinivas M, Uppal R, et al. Revised guidelines on management of antenatal hydronephrosis. Indian J Nephrol. 2013;23(2):83-97. 14. Lim DJ, Park JY, Kim JH, Paick SH, Oh SJ, Choi H. Clinical characteristics and outcome of hydronephrosis detected by prenatal ultrasonography. J Korean Med Sci. 2003;18(6):859-62. 15. Sadeghi-Bojd S, Kajbafzadeh AM, Ansari-Moghadam A, Rashidi S. Postnatal Evaluation and Outcome of Prenatal Hydronephrosis. Iran J Pediatr. 2016;26(2):e3667. 16. Meizner I, Yitzhak M, Levi A, Barki Y, Barnhard Y, Glezerman M. Fetal pelvic kidney: a challenge in prenatal diagnosis? Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology: The Official Journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1995;5(6):391-3. 17. Alsaywid B, Mohammed A, Al Ghamdi L, Banjar L. Detection of renal anomalies using antenatal and postnatal ultrasound: The consanguinity factor. Urol Ann. 2022;14(3):241-6. 18. Hiraoka M. Medical management of congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract. Pediatr Int. 2003;45(5):624-33. 19. Baktiar MP, Wardhana MP, Prasetyo RV, Renaldo J, Ernawati E. Problem in diagnosis and management of congenital anomalies kidney and urinary tract (cakut) in developing countries: a case series. Journal of Medicinal and Pharmaceutical Chemistry Research. 2024;6(4):474-80.
