THE COMPOSITION AND FACTORS INFLUENCING PROFESSIONALS' ABILITY TO CONDUCT PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCY RESCUES
Main Article Content
Keywords
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study is to investigate the composition and factors influencing professional capacity in public health emergency rescues. Methods: This study utilized a descriptive qualitative design. A purposive sampling method was used to recruit medical workers, managers, and members of an emergency rescue team in Hangzhou, Zhejiang. Semi-structured interviews were used to collect the data, which was then analyzed using traditional content analysis methods. Findings: The analysis revealed two themes and 13 sub-themes: ability composition (knowledge reserve, early warning assessment, information reporting, emergency response, self-protection, personal ability, coordination and cooperation, health education) and influencing factors (educational background, region, experience, hospital level, human resources, and financial investment). In conclusion: These findings serve as a foundation for the development of a related indicator system and as a guide for pertinent departments looking to enhance their emergency rescue capabilities, fortify their emergency drills, and further optimize their emergency education and training. According to the findings, in order to increase an organization's capacity for emergency rescue, attention must be paid to the formation of an emergency rescue team, modify the staffing ratio, enhance their compensation, and foster a work ethic.
Downloads
References
1. Gong HX, Lin PY, Jiang HL, Li S, Wu BL, Chen XH. Measurement and evaluation of emergency medical rescue capability for public health emergencies in Guangzhou. China J Health Emerg. (2019) 5:26–30. 2. Meng Q. Transformation and reform of the functions of centers for disease prevention and control in the new era. Chin J Prev Med. (2019) 53:964–7. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-9624.2019.10.002. 3. An J, Liu ZR, Liang H, Tong YS, Huang YQ. Discussion on psychological crisis intervention in public health emergencies of infectious diseases. Chin J Ment Health. (2021) 35:795–800. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000- 6729.2021.09.016. 4. Sirleaf EJ, Clark H. Report of the independent panel for pandemic preparedness and response: making COVID-19 the last pandemic. Lancet. (2021) 398:101–3. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01095-3. 5. Li PH. Challenges and legislative suggestions for emergency rescue work in the new era. China Emerg Manag. (2023) 10:52–7. 6. WHO . COVID-19 strategic preparedness and response report, 1 February- 30 June 2020. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; (2020). 7. Kinder K, Bazemore A, Taylor M, Mannie C, Strydom S, George J, et al. Integrating primary care and public health to enhance response to a pandemic. Prim Health Care Res Dev. (2021) 22:e27. 8. Zhu WH. Investigation on knowledge, attitude and practice of emergency rescue of public health emergencies among medical staff. Mass Technol. (2020) 22:117–9. 9. Westfall JM, Liaw W, Griswold K, Stange K, Green LA, Phillips R, et al. Uniting public health and primary Care for Healthy Communities in the COVID-19 era and beyond. J Am Board Fam Med. (2021) 34:S203–9. 10. Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. (2005) 15:1277–88. 11. Otani T. What is qualitative research? Yakugaku Zasshi. (2017) 137:653–8. 12. Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. (2007) 19:349–57.
