FAMILIARITY WITH THE MEDICAL LAWS OF SAUDI ARABIA
Main Article Content
Keywords
potential drug–drug interactions, pharmacokinetic, severity, revalence, patient safety.
Abstract
Objectives: This study aims to assess the Saudi healthcare workforce's familiarity with medical law and to discover the variables that contribute to this familiarity. Methods: Roughly seven hundred fifty medical professionals representing a wide range of disciplines and geographic areas throughout Saudi Arabia participated in this cross-sectional study that took place in Riyadh in 2020 and 2021. Consultants, senior registrars, interns, and residents were all part of the group. End result: Approximately 97% of the healthcare practitioners who were enrolled in the programme shown a lack of knowledge regarding medical legislation. An even more pitiful 1.5% possessed only a moderate understanding of medical law, let alone an adequate one. Having a clinical practice for less than 10 years, being from the central region, and being in the age range of 25 to 34 were factors linked to increased awareness of medical legislation (p-value 0.05). In sum, healthcare providers in Saudi Arabia have a low level of knowledge of medical law. Both the undergraduate and graduate programmes in medicine should incorporate professional medico-legal education into their curricula. Providers of medical treatment have a responsibility to familiarise themselves with the rules and regulations that govern their chosen field.
Downloads
References
1. Rahman R. The Privatization of Health Care System in Saudi Arabia. Health Serv Insights 2020; 13: 1178632920934497. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 2. Arabia’s Vision Saudi 2030. National transformation program 2020. [Updated 2022; cited 2018 Aug 11]. 2016. Available from: http://vision2030.gov.sa/sites/default/files/NTP_En.pdf [Ref list] 3. Mufti MH. Healthcare development strategies in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Springer Science & Business Media; 2000. [Google Scholar] 4. Alsharqi O. An Analysis of Access to, and the Quality of the New Health System in Saudi Arabia: Mixed Methodology Study. Clayton (Australia): Monash University; 2006. [Google Scholar] 5. Al-Saeed A. Status of medical liability claims in Saudi Arabia. Saudi J Anaesth 2007; 1: 4. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 6. Alkhenizan AH, Shafiq MR. The process of litigation for medical errors in Saudi Arabia and the United Kingdom. Saudi Med J 2018; 39: 1075–1081. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 7. Al-Hajjaj MS. Medical practice in Saudi Arabia the medico-legal aspect. Saudi Med J 1996; 17:1–4. [Google Scholar] 8. Mayeda M, Takase K. Need for enforcement of ethicolegal education–an analysis of the survey of postgraduate clinical trainees. BMC Medical Ethics 2005; 6: 1–2. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 9. Brogen AS, Rajkumari B, Laishram J, Joy A. Knowledge and attitudes of doctors on medical ethics in a teaching hospital, Manipur. Indian J Med Ethics 2009; 6: 194–197. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 10. Shiraz B, Shamim MS, Shamim MS, Ahmed A. Medical ethics in surgical wards: knowledge, attitude and practice of surgical team members in Karachi. Indian J Med Ethics 2005; 2: 94–96. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 11. World Health Organization. Health ethics in South-East Asia. InHealth ethics in South-East Asia 1999. [Updated 1999; cited 2021 Jnauary]. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/205216/B4743.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y 12. Zajdel J, Zajdel R, Kuna P. Knowledge of medical law amongst doctors of internal diseases. Int J Occup Med Environ Health 2013; 26: 242–256. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 13. Schaeffer RL, Mendenhall W, Ott L. Elementary Survey Sampling, Fourth Edition. Duxbury Press, Belmont, California: 1990. [Google Scholar] 14. Kesselheim AS. Permitting product liability litigation for FDA-approved drugs and devices promotes patient safety. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2010; 87: 645–647. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 15. Skiba R, Sikotra N, Wilson A, Clay TD, Gabbay E. Doctors’ understanding of consent law. Intern Med J 2021; 51: 1068–1073. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 16. Lamont S, Stewart C, Chiarella M. Capacity and consent: knowledge and practice of legal and healthcare standards. Nursing ethics 2019; 26: 71–83. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 17. Sposini FM. The rise of psychological physicians: The certification of insanity and the teaching of medical psychology. Int J Law Psychiatry 2021; 74: 101667. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Transfer of Copyright and Permission to Reproduce Parts of Published Papers.
Authors retain the copyright for their published work. No formal permission will be required to reproduce parts (tables or illustrations) of published papers, provided the source is quoted appropriately and reproduction has no commercial intent. Reproductions with commercial intent will require written permission and payment of royalties.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.